NISHA KUMARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THRO ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY DEVELOPMENT
WPC/4151/2026 · 2026-07-06
Deepak Roshan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19184 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19184 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:19852
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No. 4151 of 2026
……
1. Nisha Kumari, aged about 28 years, daughter of Uday Yadav, resident of village - Singhani, Post - Korra, P.S. - Muffasil, District -Hazaribagh; 2.Pankaj Prasad, aged about 33 years, son of Chakradhar, resident of village-Jhalbad, P.O.- Nawagarh, P.S.-Raj Dhanwar, District-Giridih;
3. Sunita Kumari, aged about 29 years, daughter of Raj Kumar Yadav, resident of village-Mansingha, P.O.-Murpa, P.S.-Balumath, District-Latehar …. Petitioner(s) -VERSUS-
1. The State of Jharkhand though its Secretary, Department of School Education and Litreracy Development, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, at 4th Floor, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O.+P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi;
2. Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, through its Chairman, at- Chai Bagan Gali, P.O.+P.S.-Namkum, District-Ranchi;
3. Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, through controller of Examination at Chai Bagan Gali, P.O.+P.S, Namku, District-Ranchi
…..Respondent (s)
……
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Adv
For the Respondent (s): Mr. Binit Chandra, A.C. to AAG-IV
For the JSSC
: Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Adv
Mr. Prince Kumar, Adv
……
2/06.07.2026
1. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioners praying for a direction upon the respondent-authorities to consider the case of the respective petitioners and appoint them on the remaining posts of post Graduate Trained Teacher under various subject on the basis of their inter se merit, as the petitioners are eligible candidates and they have obtained higher marks than other candidates under BC-II category.
2026:JHHC:19852
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the instant writ application may be disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioners to file individual representations before the Examination Controller, JSSC, for redressal of their grievance.
3. There is no objection from the respondents.
4. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands
disposed of by directing the petitioners to file individual representation, with details of their subject/category, before the respondent-Controller of Examination, as early as possible.
5. The moment the examination controller will receive the representation of the petitioners, he shall verify the records of the case and take a decision in respect of each individual petitioner and pass a reasoned and speaking
order within a period of 10 weeks from the date of receipt of such representation.
6. Since the Examination Controller is not a party respondent in this case, accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to make him as party respondent in course of the day as the Respondent no.3.
7. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands
disposed of. Pending I.As. if any also stands disposed of.
(Deepak Roshan, J) 06.07.2026 Amardeep/
Uploaded on 8.7.2026