MR SHUBHAM RAJPUT v. BOXING FEDERATION OF INDIA & ORS.
W.P.(C)/13987/2026 · 2026-09-23
Amit Mahajan
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19184 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19184 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~94 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010453632026 + W.P.(C) 13987/2026 & CM APPL. 65331/2026, CM APPL. 65332/2026 MR SHUBHAM RAJPUT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Gosain, Adv. (through VC) versus BOXING FEDERATION OF INDIA & ORS......Respondents Through: Ms. Vrinda Bhandari & Mr. Ranjeet Pawar, Advs. for R1 Mr. Ruchir Mishra, SPC & Mr. Vikrant Malwal, GP with Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Saxena, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Ms. Reba Jena Mishra & Ms. Poonam Shukla, Advs. for R3
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R %
23.09.2026
1. The petitioner is aggrieved by his provisional suspension by Respondent No. 1 - Boxing Federation of India. By notice dated 14.09.2026 (hereafter ‘the impugned notice’), the authorities on coming to a prima facie finding regarding discrepancy in the date of birth of the petitioner, while giving him opportunity to explain the same within a period of 14 days, provisionally suspended the petitioner from participating in any boxing events organised by Boxing Federation of India in future.
2. Undisputedly, by the impugned notice, the order of only an interim/provisional suspension has been passed and the petitioner has This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/09/2026 at 11:27:03
already been given an opportunity to explain the discrepancy.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondent, who appears on advance service, submits that as and when the reply/ explanation is filed by the petitioner, final decision shall be taken, within one week thereafter.
4. Considering the above, the present petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to file any additional reply/ documents to the impugned notice.
5. It is directed that as and when such reply/ document is filed by the petitioner, the respondent shall take the final decision, within one week thereafter.
6. Needless to say, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek redressal afresh in case any grievance remains in future.
AMIT MAHAJAN, J SEPTEMBER 23, 2026
“SS” This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/09/2026 at 11:27:03