2026:JHHC:19850 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 4079 of 2026 ---------- Ravi Ranjan Shukla, aged about 42 years, son of Late Dilip Shukla, Resident of Vill. Tiwari Marhatiya, P.O. Tildag, P.S. Garhwa, Dist- Garhwa, Jharkhand (822114). ………. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3.The Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha Department, Government of Jharkhand, having office at of its Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. The Director, Secondary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. The Jharkhand Staffs Selection Commission through its Secretary, Ranchi, having its office at Kali Nagar, Chai Bagan, Namkum, P.O. and P.S. Namkum, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 6. The Examination Controller, Jharkhand Staffs Selection Commission, Ranchi, having its office at Kali Nagar, Chai Bagan, Namkum, P.O. & P.S. Namkum, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand. ………. Respondents. ---------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Alok Kumar Verma, Advocate Mr. Deeraj Kr. Dubey, Advocate For the Respondents : Ms. Oishi Das, AC to AG M/s. Sanjoy Piprawall, Prince Kumar, Jay Prakash, Advocates ---------- 02/ 06.07.2026 By way of the present writ application the petitioner prays for direction upon the respondents to appoint him to the post of Trained Graduate Teacher pursuant to Advt. 21/2016 and release all consequential benefits, in pursuance to appointments so made. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though he has secured more marks than the last selected candidate but he has not been selected. Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instant application may be disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to approach concerned respondents, so that his grievance raised in the writ application can be redressed. 2026:JHHC:19850 2 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since counter- affidavit has not been filed, if the petitioner so wishes, he may approach the concerned authorities for redressal of his grievances. 4. Having regard to the limited submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the petitioner to file fresh representation before the respondent No. 2. The moment the respondent No. 2 will receive any such representation; he shall take decision in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulations within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. 5. As a result, the instant writ application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 6th July, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded 08.07.2026