Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19181 (JHR)

MOHSIN ANSARI ALIAS MOHSIN HUSSAIN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3657/2026 · 2026-07-07

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:19944 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI ---- A.B.A. No. 3657 of 2026 ---- Mohsin Ansari @ Mohsin Hussain, aged about 18 years, son of Istekhar Ansari, resident of Ilahi Nagar, Pundag, G.T. Road, Hindpiri, near Madina Masjid, PO and PS Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi 834001, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Sudhanshu Shekhar, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Advocate ---- 2/07.07.2026 The petitioner is apprehending his case in connection with Jagarnathpur (Pundag) PS Case No.311 of 2025 registered under sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(1), 74, 75, 77 of the BNS, 2023 and section 8 of the POCSO Act, pending in the court of learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-IV, Ranchi-cum-Special Judge, POCSO, Ranchi. 2. The leaned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has earlier moved before this Court in ABA No.7021 of 2025 which was withdrawn with the liberty to move before the learned court concerned by way of filing appropriate petition. He next submits that on the fresh ground the present anticipatory bail application is filed and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 3. Leaned counsel for the respondent State submits that earlier the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner was withdrawn by the petitioner after some argument with liberty to move before the learned court concerned and he has not moved there and further there is no fresh ground in the instant petition and in view of that the anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 4. There is no doubt that if the fresh ground is there, the second anticipatory bail application can be maintained and so far as this anticipatory bail application is concerned, there is no fresh ground and the petitioner has withdrawn the earlier anticipatory bail application with liberty to file appropriate petition before the learned court concerned, and without going there, he has filed the instant second anticipatory bail application, and in that view of the matter, this anticipatory bail application being A.B.A. No.3657 of 2026 is, hereby, dismissed. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 07.07.2026 SI/