TAUSIF NAZIR INAMDAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
ABA/1466/2026 · 2026-07-10
Shri Shivkumar Dige
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1918 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1918 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
902-ABA-1466-2026 (CR).doc Shubhada S Kadam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1466 OF 2026 Tausif Nazir Inamdar ….Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and anr. ….Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Muskan Shaikh along with Ms. Mumtaz Shaikh, Advocate for Applicant (Through VC). Mr. Balraj B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Parvez Inamdaar, Advocate for Respondent No.2. _________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 10th JULY, 2026.
P.C. :
1. The applicant is apprehending arrest in Crime No.166 of 2026 registered with Adgaon Police Station, Nashik for offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 338, 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
2. It is prosecution's case that the applicant and co-accused cheated the first informant of 1,08,00,000/- and transferred her land in ₹ their own name.
3. It is contention of learned counsel for the applicant that the matter is settled out of court, hence, custodial interrogation of the applicant is not required, and requested to allow the application. SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date: 2026.07.13 18:26:43 +0530
902-ABA-1466-2026 (CR).doc Shubhada S Kadam
4. It is contention of learned APP that the applicant cheated the first informant and transferred the applicant’s land in his name. Considering the allegations against the applicant, his custodial interrogation is required, and requested to reject the application.
5. It is contention of learned counsel for the first informant that the matter is settled out of Court and the first informant has no objection to allowing the bail application.
6. I have heard all learned counsel, perused FIR and documents produced on record. As the matter is settled out of Court, custodial interrogation of the applicant is not required, and I pass following order:
ORDER (i) In the event of arrest, the applicant be enlarged on bail in Crime No. 166 of 2026 registered with Adgaon Police Station, on executing P.R.Bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. (ii) The applicant shall pay cost of Rs.20,000/- to Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, and produce the receipt thereof on the file of this Court. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is accordingly disposed of.
902-ABA-1466-2026 (CR).doc Shubhada S Kadam
7. Mr. Parvez Inamdar, learned counsel, tendered vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.2, which is taken on record.
8. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)