Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010140562026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3311] Tuesday, the Twenty Fourth day of March Two Thousand and Twenty Six Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Civil Revision Petition No: 877 of 2026 Between: Kinkiri Sai Kiran Reddy and another ...Petitioners and Challa Narayana Swamy and others ...Respondents Counsel for the petitioners:
1. Allu Hari Narayana Counsel for the respondents:
Nil The Court made the following:
2 C.R.P.No.877 of 2026
ORDER:
This revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by the repeated returns of E.A.C.F.No.420 of 2026 in E.P.No.14 of 2025 in O.S.No.17 of 2020 on the file of the Court of the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kadiri, Ananthapuramu District. 2. The revision petitioner filed a claim petition under Order XXI, Rule 58 of C.P.C. vide C.F.No.420 of 2026 on 09.02.2026. The petition was returned by the office of the execution Court and resubmitted several times which read as follows:
“Returned on 11.02.2026:
1. Petition schedule property relating documents not filed. 2. Remaining respondents notice not given. Hence this petition returned
Represented on 17.02.2026:
1. Petition schedule property joint family property are not available present. 2. Objection No.2 complied. Returned on 24.02.2026:
1. Previous objections dated 11.02.2026 are not complied. Represented:
All objections complied. Returned on 06.03.2026:
Previous objections at 11.02.2026 are not complied. Hence this petition is returned.”
3 C.R.P.No.877 of 2026
3. As can be seen from the above endorsements of returns and representations, it appears that the petitioner has not made any request to call the matter before Bench inviting an order after hearing the petitioner on the objections. 4. Therefore, the civil revision petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to represent the petition in E.A.C.F.No.420 of 2026 before the same Court with a request to call the matter before the Bench, if the office is not satisfied with the representation. Thereafter, the concerned Court shall pass appropriate order after hearing the petitioner as expeditiously as possible. 5. The Registry is directed to forthwith return the original petition in C.F.No.420 of 2026, dated 09.02.2026 to the learned counsel for the petitioner as per the established procedure. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated: 24.03.2026 Note: Issue C.C. by today b/o. NSM
4 C.R.P.No.877 of 2026
45 The Honourable Ms.
Justice B.S.Bhanumathi
Civil Revision Petition No: 877 of 2026
Dated: 24.03.2026 Note: Issue C.C. by today b/o. NSM