Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19177 (HP)

TILAK RAJ AND ANR v. NIPUN JINDAL AND ANR

CMP/17391/2026 · 2026-08-20

Sushil Kukreja

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Tilak Raj & Ors. vs. Nipoun Jindal & another CMP No.17391 of 2026 in COPC No.1392 of 2025 20.08.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioners. Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the respondents. Learned counsel for the applicants/petitioners, fairly submits that judgment under reference has been complied with, with respect to petitioner No.1, TilakRaj, however, it has not been complied with, with respect to petitioner No.2, Brij Lal. Confronted with this, learned counsel for the respondents states that judgment under reference shall be complied with, with respect to petitioner No.2, Brij Lal, within a period of two days. Therefore, in this view of the matter, the present application is disposed of. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to revive the present contempt petition, if they still remain aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge August 20, 2026 (reena)