APHC010138952019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.Nos.1 & 2 of 2026 IN/AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No: 507/2019 Between: KARLAPUDI SUBHASHAN, S/O DAVID, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O NEAR PEDACHERUVU, INTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI. 2. VOLETI UDAYA GIRI, S/O. KOTAIAH, AGED 58 YEARS, R/O. CHINA RAJAKA CHERUVU, GANGANAMMAPET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. CHILAKA ALEX BABU 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: The Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the Petitioner / Accused, impugning the judgment dated 26.04.2019 passed in Crl.A.No.596 of 2016 on the file of the Court of XI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tenali confirming the judgment dated 25.10.2016 passed in C.C.No.386 of 2010 by 2 the learned I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tenali for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 2. I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2026 are filed by the Respondent No.2 seeking permission to compound offence and to record the compromise by allowing the present Criminal Revision Case. 3. Accused and Respondent No.2 appeared before this Court and were identified by their respective learned counsel. Copies of their Aadhar cards attested by their respective counsel are filed for proper identification. 4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor is in attendance. 5. Respondent No.2 by way of an affidavit would submit that at the intervention of elders and well-wishers of both parties, the matter was amicably settled between them. Accused agreed to pay an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- to him towards full and final settlement and out of the said amount, Rs.40,000/- has already been deposited before the trial Court. Both parties filed a joint memo to that effect and finally prays for allowing the present Criminal Revision Case. 6. Accused paid the balance amount of Rs.60,000/- by way of two Demand Drafts before this Court. 7. Considering the submissions, in the interests of justice, I.A.Nos. 1 and 2 of 2026 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed setting aside the judgment dated 26.04.2019 passed in Crl.A.No.596 of 2016 on the file of the Court of XI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tenali confirming the judgment dated 25.10.2016 in C.C.No.386 of 2010 passed by 3 the learned I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tenali for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Accused is acquitted from the present case. Petitioner / Accused shall pay costs of Rs.10,000/- to the High Court Legal Services Committee. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee is directed to spend the said amount to meet the necessities of the children in the Government Home. Respondent No.2 is permitted to receive the amount of Rs.40,000/- which was deposited before the trial Court. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:06.02.2026 Dinesh 4 THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.Nos.1 & 2 of 2026 IN/AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:507 OF 2019 Dt.06.02.2026 Dinesh