Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19176 (CHH)

SANKATHA PRASAD PATHAK v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/2364/2025 · 2026-05-13

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:22848 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2364 of 2025 1 - Sankatha Prasad Pathak S/o Shri Foujdar Pathak Aged About 55 Years Ward No. 14, Church Road Street No. 1 Bhilai District - Durg (C.G.) Adhar No. 465136655565 2 - Shyam Bahadur Singh S/o Shri Mathura Singh Aged About 48 Years R/o House No. 43, Near Ekta Chouck Ward No. 16, Kailash Nagar, Kurud P.S. Jamul District - Durg (C.G.) Adhar No. 930041634281 3 - Kuber Narayan Agrawal S/o Shri Shiv Kumar Agrawal Aged About 48 Years R/o Quarter No. 5, Bloack No. 8 Pt. Deendayal Puram Colony Near Nagar, Palika Office Ward No. 28, New Khursipar, District - Durg (C.G.) Adhar No. 582739826913 (Details Wrongly Incompletely Mentioned In Annexures) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer (S.H.O.) P.S. Berla, District - Bemetara, (C.G.) 2 - Pushpa Vishwakarma W/o Shri Ganesh Vishwakarma R/o Opposite Bansal Petrol Pump, Jamul P.S. Jamul District - Durg (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioners : Ms. Swati Rani Saraf, Advocate. For Respondent 1/State : Shri Vivek Sharma, P.L. For Respondent 2 : Ms. Sweksha Sharma, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Prasoon Agrawal, Advocate. (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL) Order on Board 14/05/2026 Digitally signed by ALLENA ANJANI KUMAR Date: 2026.05.14 17:32:57 +0530 2 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition. 2. Accordingly, the present CRMP is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) JUDGE Anjani