Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19173 (JHR)

TEJU KUMAR BHOKTA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6200/2026 · 2026-07-06

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:19766] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6200 of 2026 ------ Teju Kumar Bhokta aged about 26 Years son of Jaglal Ganjhu, resident of Village Rajguruwa, Post Office & Police Station Chatra Sadar, District Chatra Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Manish Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-06-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No.20 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(6), 109, 118(2), 125, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted bag of gold and silver ornaments from the informant and also looted cash of Rs.5,000/-. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that without putting the petitioner on T.I. Parade as mentioned in para-9 of the instant Bail Application, charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 16.05.2026 as is evident from para-1 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 25.06.2026 passed in B.A. No.5823 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Hazaribagh in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No.20 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 06.07.2026 Saroj/