Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19170 (AP)

SHAIK RUBINA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/2161/2023 · 2026-02-05

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010140892023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2161/2023 Between: 1.SHAIK RUBINA, W/O. SHAIK MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN, D/O. SHAIK KAMAL BASHA, MUSLIM , AGED 23 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.17/53,NEAR FOOD HUB RESTAURANT RAVINDRA NAGAR, KADAPA CITY YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 516 001. 2.SHAIK KAMAL BASHA, S/O. SHAIK ABDUL SATTAR, MUSLIM, AGED 53 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.17/53,NEAR FOOD HUB RESTAURANT RAVINDRA NAGAR, KADAPA CITY YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 516 001. 3.SHAIK KOUSAR BHANU, W/O. SHAIK KAMAL BASHA, MUSLIM, AGED 49 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.17/53,NEAR FOOD HUB RESTAURANT RAVINDRA NAGAR, KADAPA CITY YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 516 001. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI. 2.SHAIK MOHAMMED HUSSAIN, S/O. ABDUL RAWOOF, AGED 28 YEARS,MUSLIM, R/O. D.NO.20/204-A, AKULA STREET, KADAPA CITY, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.SHAIK ARIF Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 2 1.S DILIP JAYA RAM 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned Counsel for the Petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Criminal Petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 06.02.2026 VTS