Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1917 (CHH)

DINESH KUMAR SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5037/2019 · 2026-02-03

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:6338 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5037 of 2019 1 - Dinesh Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Lakhan Lal Sahu Aged About 31 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Primary School, Dhondra, Block Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of School Education Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, 2 - The Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., 3 - The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., 4 - Shri K.K. Sen, the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., 5 - The Block Education Officer Education Block Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., 6 - Shri Mahesh Banjare (Reporter) S/o Shri Chakradhar Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Pacheda, Tehsil Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri RK Kesharwani, Advocate. For Respondents/ State : Shri Anmol Sharma, Panel Lawyer. KRISHNA KUMAR BARVE Digitally signed by KRISHNA KUMAR BARVE Date: 2026.02.05 12:01:49 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal , J Order On Board 04/02/2026 1. At the outset, Mr. Kesharwani, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, would submit that Annexure P-1 which is challenged in this writ petition, is an internal communication issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Abhanpur to the Block Education Officer, Abhanpur, District Raipur. However, at present, nothing adverse has been done against the petitioner, therefore, he may be granted liberty to pursue the remedy once any action is taken against him. 2. The prayer is fair and reasonable and it is not opposed by the other side. 3. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner that as and when any adverse action is taken against him, he may question the same, in accordance with law. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE Barve