APHC010136742026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 7210/2026 Between: Kosana Anjamma, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. BAGGI VENKATA PAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of Respondent No.3 in interfering in civil disputes and summoning the petitioners to the Police Station as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional consequently direct Respondent No 3 not to interfere with the Civil disputes between petitioner and respondents No 4 and 5 and not to summon them to the police station without following the due process of law and to pass other order(s)…” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. Perused the record. 2 3. Sri Baggi Venkata Pavan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that Respondent No.3 is harassing the petitioners in connection with the civil complaint lodged by Respondent No.5, and is summoning and harassing the petitioners in connection with the said civil dispute. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that Respondent No.5 lodged a written complaint bearing No. PLND202511038613 dated 03.11.2025 through the Public Grievance Redress System. The said complaint was forwarded to Krosuru Police Station. In connection with the enquiry into the said complaint, Respondent No.3 called the petitioners for enquiry. 5. Considering the above submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing Respondent No.3 not to further call the petitioners at the behest of the unofficial respondents in connection with the civil disputes pending between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents, and not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ________________________ Dr.Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J. Date: 12.03.2026 KMS 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.7210 of 2026 Date: 12.03.2026 KMS 92