(2026:JHHC:19798) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6239 of 2026 Prince Yadav @ Rikki Yadav, aged about 18 years, son of Bikram Yadav, resident of Ratu Road, Galaxia Mall, Baba Hospital, Churi Centre, PO – Ratu Sub Post Office, PS – Sukhdeonagar, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … …Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Party ------ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Apurva, Advocate : Mr. Dilip Kr. Saw, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No:- 04, Dated:- 06th July, 2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Sukhdeonagar P.S. Case No.619 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 126(2)/ 115(2)/ 117(2)/ 109(1)/ 352/351(2)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant and his family members and demanded extortion of Rs.50,000/-. It is further submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is all false and for the self-same occurrence, from the side of the petitioner, Sukhdeonagar P.S. Case No. 619 of 2024 has been instituted against the informant and others. It is next submitted that no witness has been examined in this case as yet. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 01.04.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 10 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant, victims or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused persons with similar allegations have already been granted bail by this Court on 11.07.2025 passed in B.A. No. 5727 of 2025. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.J.C. - XII, Ranchi, in connection with Sukhdeonagar P.S. Case No.619 of 2024, with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile numbers during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated – 06.07.2026 Aditi