IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. 414 of 2026 Date of Decision: 17.08.2026. Ashwani Kumar ...Applicant/Petitioner Versus The Kangra Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. ...Non-applicant/Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the Applicant/Petitioner : Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate. For the Non-Applicant/Respondent : Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Kshitij Thakur, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) As per report of the Registry an amount of ₹18,750/- being the 7.5% of the cheque amount of ₹2,50,000/- has been deposited. Learned counsel for respondent/complainant, under instructions submits that he does not want to proceed further with the present complaint filed by him. 2. The record shows that the petitioner/accused was convicted and sentenced by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 Kullu, District Kullu on 23.03.2022/25.03.2022, in Criminal Case No. 2152/2013, titled The Kangra Central Co-operative Bank Limited vs. Ashwani Kumar as affirmed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P. in Criminal Appeal No. 22 of 2022 dated 26.08.2022 titled Ashwani Kumar Vs. Teh Kangra Central Co-operative Bank Limited. 3. It has been submitted that no amount has been deposited before the learned Trial Court or this Court. In view of this, no order is required to be passed for the disbursal of the amount by this Court. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 17th August, 2026 (Nikita)