APHC010139322018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] SATURDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 473/2018 Between: 1. K.MURALIDHAR REDDY, OCC- ADVOCATE AND FLAT NO. 504, SRINILAYAM APARTMENTS, TEJASWI NAGAR, ATTAPUR, HYDERABAD. 500 048. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI R KARIKAL VALAVEN I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (H1) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI V RAMUDU, THE DIRECTOR OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION COMPLEX, WEST ANNAPURNA NAGAR, 4TH LANE EXTENSION, GORANTLA- 522 034, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI K KANNA BABU IAS, THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 4. SRI ALEEM BASHA, MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, THE NELLORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, NELLORE, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. SRI REVURI MUTHYALA RAJU I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT. 2 6. SMT D HARITHA, LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER/ REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NELLORE, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to Summon the respondents and punish them for willful disobeying violation of the orders dated 22-12-2017 made in W.P. No. 43813 of 2017 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T LAKSHMI NARAYANA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP) 2. ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO 3. 4. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: The present contempt case has been filed alleging violation of an interim order passed by the learned Single Judge of the erstwhile High Court at Hyderabad, on 22.12.2017 in W.P.No.43813 of 2017. The main writ petition itself had been disposed of directing to fix compensation under the Act 30 of 2013, on 04.03.2021. 2. In that view of the matter, nothing further would survive in this contempt case and accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J Date: 07.03.2026 KA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 473/2018 Date: 07.03.2026 KA