` SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.309 of 2026 Verma Plumbering Works through its Proprietor Vijay Kumar …………Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand and another ……….Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Devendra Pant, learned S.C. for the State. 3. Mr. Ashutosh Thakral, learned counsel for the respondent no.2. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the present writ petition the total amount due against the Nagar Palika Parishad has been paid to the petitioner. 5. Now nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 6. Since the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, the writ petition has rendered infructuous. 7. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed as infuctuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 07.04.2026 SK