Sri. Pathan Mahaboob Khan v. State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/6064/2019 · 2026-01-06
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19149 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19149 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010134232019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6064/2019 Between:
1. SRI. PATHAN MAHABOOB KHAN, SIO. SARDAR JANI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 18-4-4, SYED KHAN STREET, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , PEDAKAKANI POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any othe appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not registering a crime against the petitioners complaint dt.26.11.2018 as illegal,arbitrary and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to register an FIR as against Petitioners complaint, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the 3`d Respondent to register an FIR forthwith against my complaint dt.26.11.2018, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following:
2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.6064 of 2019
ORDER:
The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 3rd respondent in not registering an FIR on the petitioner’s complaint dated 26.11.2018 as illegal and arbitrary, and consequently directing the 3rd respondent to register the FIR in accordance with law.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submitted that both parties have compromised the matter, as informed by the petitioner, and therefore prayed that the writ petition be dismissed.
4. In light of these submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition may be closed by recording the
submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader.
3
5. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is closed at the admission stage without going into the merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 7th January, 2026 cbn
4 65 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.6064 of 2019
7th January, 2026
cbn