NARAYAN LAL ATAL S/O LATE SHRI PRABHATI LAL ATAL v. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JAIPUR
CW/19186/2025 · 2026-01-27
Maneesh Sharma
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19142 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19142 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3477] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19186/2025
1. Narayan Lal Atal S/o Late Shri Prabhati Lal Atal, Aged About 72 Years, 57 Krishna Nagar, Kartarpura, Jaipur
2. Harinarayan Mandawariya S/o Shri Gyarsi Lal Mandawariya, Aged About 60 Years, R/o 60 Krishna Nagar, Kartarpura, Jaipur ----petitioners Versus
1. Jaipur Development Authority Jaipur, Through Secretary And Smt. Ujjawal Rathore W/o Unknown At Present Working As Secretary Jda, Jaipur, Indra Circle, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur
2. Om Thanvi S/o Unknown At Present Working On The Post Of Dy. Commissioner, Zone-5, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioners(s) : Mr. Devendra Kumar Bhardwaj HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 27/01/2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
"It is, therefore, most respectfully, prayed that Your Lordships may most graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and direct the learned Appellate Tribunal, JDA, Jaipur to immediately close the reply of respondents in contempt peti- tion No.61/2022 titled as Narayan Lal Atal & Anr. vs. JDA & Ors. without providing them further opportunity and also decide the contempt petition on merit within a period of 3 months:- Any other order(s), which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioners."
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the appeal No.319/2014 (CIS No.503/2015) filed by the petitioners was allowed by the learned Appellate Tribunal, JDA vide judgment dated 27.04.2022, however, the said judgment has not been implemented, thus, on 16.09.2022, the petitioners filed a contempt petition No. 61/2022 before the learned Appellate Tribunal, JDA for willful disobedience of the judgment dated 27.04.2022. He further submits that in the contempt proceedings, service stands complete, yet the learned Appellate Tribunal is not deciding the case. Therefore, he
[2026:RJ-JP:3477] (2 of 2) [CW-19186/2025] prays that direction may be issued to the learned Appellate Tribunal, JDA to decide the contempt petition No.61/2022 titled as 'Narayan Lal Atal & Anr. vs. JDA Jaipur & Anr.', expeditiously, preferably in a time-bound manner.
3. Heard and considered the submissions and perused the record.
4. Record of the case reveals that it is an undisputed fact that the appeal filed by the petitioners herein was allowed by the learned Appellate Tribunal, JDA vide order dated 27.04.2022 and since the said order was not implemented, therefore, the petitioners filed the contempt petition No.61/2022. From the record, it is also revealed that the said contempt petition is pending before the learned Appellate Tribunal since 16.09.2022 and despite completion of service in the contempt petition, no order has been passed therein.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned Appellate Tribunal, JDA is directed to decide the contempt petition No.61/2022 titled as ‘Narayan Lal Atal & Anr. vs. JDA Jaipur & Anr.’ filed by the petitioners expeditiously, preferably within a period of four (4) months from the date of filing of the certified copy of this order.
6. With the aforesaid direction, the present civil writ petition stands disposed of.
7. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA/RAHUL-6