M/S SRI RAMACHANDRA REXINS PVT LTD v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/21678/2025 · 2026-06-03
R Nataraj
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19141 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19141 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26024 WP No. 21678 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 21678 OF 2025 (LA-RES) BETWEEN:
M/S SRI RAMACHANDRA REXINS PVT LTD A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY, OFFICE AT NO. 29/2, 4TH MAIN ROAD, NEW TARAGUPET, BENGALURU -560 002
PRESENTLY REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI VENKATESH GUPTA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. V VISWANATH SETTY, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, OFFICE AT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001,
2.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, NO.678/3, NEERUBHAVI ABBAIAH LAYOUT, HEBBAL, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA 560 024,
3.
THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY, NO.84/11, UTTARAHALLI MAIN ROAD,
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26024 WP No. 21678 of 2025
KENGERI, BENGALURU-560 060
4.
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL, BENGALURU DIRTRICT-562 106
5.
THE SURVEYOR, SURVEY DEPARTMENT, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DIRTRICT-562 106
6.
SRI D. MUNIYAPPA, S/O DEKAPPA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/AT BOMMASANDRA VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT.560 099 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.ADITYA DIWAKAR, AGA FOR R1, 4 AND 5)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO THE R-3 AUTHORITIES TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION/ REPRESENTATION DATED 25.06.2025 AND 30.06.2025 AS PER ANNEXURE-H1 AND H2 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26024 WP No. 21678 of 2025
ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 03.06.2026, to withdraw the writ petition and has sought liberty to file a fresh petition in case if it is needed.
2. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. If the petition has a fresh cause of action, it is always at liberty to approach this Court.
Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
BKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6