Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19140 (MAD)

R.Sundarajan v. The District Collector

WP(MD)/6645/2026 · 2026-03-12

Hemant Chandangoudar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.6645 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR W.P.(MD)No.6645 of 2026 and W.M.P.(MD)No.5489 of 2026 R.Sundarajan ... Petitioner vs. 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Tahsildar, Kamuthi Taluk, Kamuthi, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayats), Kamuthi Union, Kamuthi, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents to form road in the petitioner’s property in Survey No.177/2A, to an extent of 0.3.00 Ares situated at P.Muthuramalingapuram Village, Kamuthi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District and consider the petitioner’s representation dated 20.02.2026. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.6645 of 2026 For Petitioner :Mr.K.Guhan For Respondents :Mr.S.Kameswaran Government Advocate ***** O R D E R The petitioner is before this Court seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondents from forming a road in the petitioner’s property in Survey No.177/2A, to an extent of 0.3.00 Ares, situated at P. Muthuramalingapuram Village, Kamuthi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 2. The petitioner has also filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction against the respondents herein before the jurisdictional civil Court. In the said suit, the defendants had filed a written statement stating that they do not intend to form a road in the subject property. However, according to the petitioner, the third respondent is now attempting to form a road in the subject property forcibly without following due process of law. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.6645 of 2026 3. Mr. S. Kameswaran, learned Government Advocate, who accepted notice on behalf of the respondents, placed on record certain photographs to indicate that the road has already been formed. 4. In view of the above development, the relief sought for by the petitioner in this Writ Petition does not survive for further consideration. Therefore, the Writ Petition is disposed of, preserving liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate relief by making necessary amendments in the pending suit before the jurisdictional civil Court, including a prayer for mandatory injunction. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index :Yes / No 12.03.2026 Internet :Yes / No NCC :Yes / No cmr 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.6645 of 2026 To 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Tahsildar, Kamuthi Taluk, Kamuthi, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayats), Kamuthi Union, Kamuthi, Ramanathapuram District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.6645 of 2026 HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J. cmr W.P.(MD)No.6645 of 2026 12.03.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis