2026:JHHC:19312-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) (DB)(HB) No.376 of 2026 ------ Kanchan Kumari, aged about 29 years, W/O Bablu Kumar Mahto, R/O Village-Gidhour, PO & PS-Gidhour, Distt.-Chatra, Jharkhand …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Prison and Disaster, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, HEC Compound, PO & PS-Dhurwa, Distt.-Ranchi, Jharkhand 2. The Director General of Police, Jharkhand Police Headquarter, HEC Compound, PO & PS-Dhurwa, Distt.-Ranchi, Jharkhand 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Hazaribagh Range, NH 33, Suresh Colony, PO-Hazaribagh Head Post Office, PS-Sadar, Distt.-Hazaribagh, Jharkhand 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Chatra, PO, PS & Distt.-Chatra, Jharkhand 5. The Superintendent of Police, Chatra, PO & PS-Chatra, Distt., Chatra, Jharkhand 6. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Simaria, Chatra, PO & PS- Simariya, Distt.-Chatra, Jharkhand 7. Anant Shayanan Vishwakarma, S/O Not Know, The Circle Officer, Gidhour, PO & PS-Gidhour, District-Chatra, Jharkhand. 8. Shiva Yadav, S/O Not Know, Officer-in charge, Gidhour PS, PO & PS-Gidhour, Distt.-Chatra, Jharkhand 9. Chandan Kumar, S/O Not Know, Chowkidar, Gidhour PS, PO & PS-Gidhour, Distt.-Chatra, Jharkhand 10. Sunil Kumar Singh, S/O Not Know, Investigating Officer of Gidhour PS Case No.103 of 2025, PO & PS-Gidhour, Distt.- Chatra, Jharkhand 11. The CBI, Ranchi, Near Morabadi Maidan, 2, Booti Road, Morabadi, PO-Ranchi University Post Office, PS-Sadar, Distt.- Ranchi, Jharkhand ..... .... Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. P.S. Dayal, Advocate Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate Mr. Anurag Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shubham Gautam, AC to Sr. AAG For Res. No.11 : Mr. Prashant Pallav, A.S.G.I. Mr. Shivani Jaluka, AC to A.S.G.I. ------ 02/Dated: 02.07.2026 1. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks 2026:JHHC:19312-DB 2 leave of this Court not to press the instant petition with a liberty to approach before the appropriate forum. 2. There is no opposition on the part of the learned State Counsel as also the learned counsel for the respondent no.11-CBI. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Sanjay Prasad, J.) 02.07.2026 Rohit/-