Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:19510 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 4165 of 2026
-------
Gourav Kumar Das,son of Naresh Das, resident of Village-Kalhor, P.O. & P.S.- Pathrol, Dist.-Deoghar
.... Petitioner(s).
Versus The State of Jharkhand
. … Opp. Party(s).
------
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the State:
Mr. S.K. Tiwary, Spl. P.P.
------
03/ 03.07.2026 This bail application has been filed under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as the petitioner is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Section(s) 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 61(2) of BNS, 2023 and under Section(s) 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) & 84( C) of the Information Technology Act in connection with Cyber Crime No. 20 of 2026, arising out of Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 121 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum- Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar.
2. Heard, learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the impugned order.
3. Learned Spl. P.P opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
4. Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected on 19.02.2026 in B.A. No. 11438 of 2025. The investigation of this case is complete. From the case diary, it transpires that the mobile having I.M.E.I No. 356763084415077 seized from the petitioner, used in defrauding a sum of Rs. 2,475/- from the complainant, which has been confirmed from the Call Details Report (CDR).
5. Considering the aforesaid fact, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, named above, stands rejected. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed.
6. The trial should be concluded within six months.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 03rd July, 2026 Anu/SKC-CP3.