DEEPAKSINGH ALIAS ANIL SON OF AMIRCHAND v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SOSA/2137/2025 · 2026-02-06
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19128 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19128 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:5708] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.2137/2025 In S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2565/2025 Deepaksingh Alias Anil Son Of Amirchand, Resident Of Bosoli Police Station Uchchain, Presently Resident Of Subhash Nagar Police Station Kotwali District Bharatpur. At Present In Central Jail, Bharatpur. ----Appellant Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through The P.P. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order 06/02/2026 Instant application for suspension of sentence has been preferred on behalf of the applicant-appellant under Section 430 of BNSS alongwith the appeal, to suspend the sentence awarded by the Court of Additinal Sessions Judge, No. 2, Bharatpur, vide its
judgment dated 08.09.2025, in Sessions Case No.04/2023, whereby the applicant-appellant was convicted for the alleged offence(s) & sentenced to undergo maximum period of seven years simple imprisonment with fine.
Learned counsel appearing for the applicant-appellant submits that presently he is behind the bars since 08.09.2025 i.e. the date of judgment. The injured, namely Ajit has not suffered
[2026:RJ-JP:5708] (2 of 3) [SOSA 2137/2025] any dangerous to life injury and as per FSL report, the injured has not suffered any fire arm injury. Counsel further submits that there are contradictions in the statements of the witnesses recorded during trial and based on the grounds set forth in the appeal, the appellant has a strong likelihood of success and substantial prospect of acquittal. The learned Trial Court has not appreciated the facts and circumstances of the case holistically and the hearing of the appeal will take its own time, hence, the sentence awarded to the applicant-appellant may be suspended during the pendency of the appeal and Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the
submissions made herein-above. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the statements of injured, namely Ajit (PW-1), medical expert (PW- 10) & the FSL Report (Ex.P-52) and the material made available on record. Taking into consideration the term of sentence, Custody Period & the submissions made at bar and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicant-appellant during the pendency of the appeal. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is, hereby, ordered that the execution of sentence awarded to accused-applicant, namely Deepak Singh alias Anil S/o Amirchand, by the learned Trial Court shall remain suspended during pendency of the appeal, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two
[2026:RJ-JP:5708] (3 of 3) [SOSA 2137/2025] sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 06.03.2026 and thereafter, as and when he is called upon to do so.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /50