[2026:RJ-JP:2741] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13149/2025 1. Kallaram S/o Prakash Chand, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Gram Udai Khurd, Tehsil Vajirpur, District Sawai Mad- hopur, Raj. 2. Abhishek Adopted Son Kailash, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Gram Udai Khurd, Tehsil Vajirpur, District Sawai Mad- hopur, Raj. ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Asgar Khan Mr. Junaid Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 21/01/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioners under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 58/2025, reg- istered with the Police Station, Piloda, District Sawai Madhopur for offence punishable under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 324(4), 140(3) and 304(2) of BNS 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been implicated in the case based on false and fabricated facts. He further submits that even the con- tents of the First Information Report reveals that when several persons were sitting over to have resolve the matrimonial dispute, [2026:RJ-JP:2741] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13149/2025] the alleged incident took place all of a sudden without there being any intention of the accused. Learned counsel further submits that none of the injury sustained by the complainant party has been opined to be dangerous to life. He also submits that name of the accused-petitioners are not mentioned in the First Information Report. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. 4. Considered the submissions made by the counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material made available on record. 5. The Court vide order dated 02.12.2025 had directed the accused-petitioners to appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation. 6. Learned Public Prosecutor states that the accused-petitioners have already appeared before the Investigating Officer and they have been interrogated by the police. 7. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that name of the accused-petitioners does not find place in the First Information Report and they have already joined the investigation, this Court deems it just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 8. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station, Piloda, District Sawai Madhopur in FIR No. 58/2025, is directed that in the event [2026:RJ-JP:2741] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13149/2025] of arrest of the petitioners they shall be released on bail, provided that they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for in interrogation by a police officer as and when re- quired; (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police offi- cer, and (iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without pre- vious permission of the Court. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /201