APHC010139742013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 9574/2013 Between: 1. K.V.V.SATYANARAYANA, S/O NUKINAIDU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT (UNDER TERMINATION), R/O J.V.PALEM, S.RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS, PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGMENT AGENCY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHPATNAM. 2. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, S.RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings issued by the 1st respondent in notice No.382/2012/DVC/B4, dated /11/2012 as illegal, arbitrary, suffers from non application of mind, contrary to G.O.Ms.No.98, dated 9.3.2010, contrary to Circular dated 27.1.2010, contrary to orders passed by this Hon'bie Court in W.P.No.14121 of 2009 and batch dated 7.7.2010 and also violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner as Field Assistant under N.R.E.G. Scheme of J.V.Palem Village, S.Rayavaram 2 Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, with all consequential and incidential benefits attached to the post IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 11926 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the proceedings issued by the 1st respondent in notice No.382/2012/DVC/B4, dated /11/2012, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V V SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 03.02.2026 PNS