BHANWAR LAL S/O NAND LAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/15042/2021 · 2026-01-27
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19124 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19124 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3563-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15042/2021
1. Bhanwar Lal S/o Nand Lal Meena, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Village Negdiya, Rajmahal, Distt. Tonk.
2. Babu Lal S/o Kishna Ram, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Naya Gaon, District Tonk ( Raj.)
3. Dhanraj Jat S/o Poluram Jat, Resident Of Nayagaon, Rajmahal Tonk ( Raj.)
4. Rajesh Kumar Jat S/o Baijnath Jat, Resident Of Karigaro Ki Gali, Rajmahal, Tonk District Tonk ( Raj.)
5. Ramesh Chand Jat S/o Nanuram Jat, Resident Of Satwada,rajmahal, District Tonk (Raj.)
6. Chhitar Lal Meena S/o Jagannath Meena, Aged About 61 Years, Resident Of 98, Dhani Negadiya, Mandir Ke Pass, Naya Gaon, District Tonk ( Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur ( Raj.)
2. District Collector, Tonk (Raj.)
3. Regional Manager, Rajasthan Pollution Control, 41 Jhalana Institutional Area, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur ( Raj.)
4. Tehsildar, Devli, District Tonk (Raj.)
5. Secretary, Gram Panchayat Devi Kheda, Tehsil Devli, District Tonk (Raj.)
6. Jagdish S/o Sheokaran, Resident Of Village Satwada, Post Rajmahal, District Tonk ( Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Divyanshu Gupta. Ms. Shubhi Gaur. Mr. Tanishq Jhavery. Ms. Simran Sharma.
[2026:RJ-JP:3563-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-15042/2021] HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA O R D E R 27/01/2026
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent-Pollution Control Board submits that all the necessary compliance regarding the Brick Kiln are being made, which is supported by an affidavit.
Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly agrees to the statement and the affidavit submitted for the same. Consequently, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. All pending applications, if any, stand
disposed of.
(SANGEETA SHARMA),J (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J 166-Zeeshan