APHC010138462015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 41850/2015 Between: Y. Varalakshmi and another ...PETITIONERS AND The Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation and others ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners: Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. K. Krishna Bushan Chowdary (Central Government Counsel) The Court made the following ORDER: The present writ petition is filed seeking the following relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents in not deducting appropriate deductions and further action in denying benefits due to the petitioner under EPF Act and ESI Act as highly illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India, and contrary to the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act and Rules made therein and pass…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. K. Krishna Bhushan Chowdary, learned Standing Counsel for A.P. GENCO, submits that, in terms of the order, dated 31.01.2026, the General Manager of the A.P. GENCO 2 MRK, J W.P.No.41850 of 2015 pursued the record. However, in view of lack of proper prerequisite details mentioned either in the writ affidavit or in the material papers, the petitioners were not able to demonstrate the period for which they worked under the respondent contractor. In the absence of the said important details, it is impracticable to track the alleged erred contractor. 3. In light of the above submissions made by the learned Standing Counsel, this Court has gone through the averments made in the writ affidavit and finds that, writ affidavit lacks the prerequisite details and also non-joinder of proper and necessary parties for effective adjudication of the lis, as rightly pointed out by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 4. In light of the above facts and circumstances, and in the interest of justice, the present writ petition is dismissed on the ground of non-joinder of the proper and necessary parties. However, liberty is left open to the petitioners to take appropriate steps, including filing a fresh writ petition by arraying the proper and necessary parties with all prerequisite details within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed with the above liberty. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 05.02.2026 kbs 3 MRK, J W.P.No.41850 of 2015 60 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.41850 of 2015 Date: 05.02.2026 kbs