Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19116 (JHR)

RAVI KUMAR @ RAVI KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4323/2026 · 2026-07-07

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:19961 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4323 of 2026 Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Kumar Singh, son of Deva Singh … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Party : None --- 05/7th July 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Bishnugarh P.S. Case No. 12 of 2026 for the offence registered under Section 69, 88, 108/3(5) of BNS and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, now said to have been pending in the court of learned J.M., 1st Class, Hazaribagh. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was love affair between the petitioner and the deceased and for the purposes of marriage negotiation, the father of the deceased had come to the house of the petitioner to talk to his parents and there was some talks regarding dowry of three lakhs and one motorcycle and as per the allegation, when the deceased was informed that in case, the demand is not satisfied, the petitioner will be married to someone else. Thereafter, the deceased committed suicide by consuming poison. The learned counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since 23.01.2026 and charge-sheet has been submitted on 22.03.2026. 3. Nobody appears on behalf of the opposite party. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and upon going through the post-mortem report, it is apparent that the deceased died due to poisoning and the sample has been sent for FSL examination. The FIR reveals that the demand of dowry was primarily made by the parents of the petitioner. 2026:JHHC:19961 2 5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the fact that the charge-sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty- Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M., 1st Class, Hazaribagh in connection with Bishnugarh P.S. Case No. 12 of 2026, subject to the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. The State is directed to ensure that the forensic report be submitted to the court concerned. 8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the SFSL Ranchi and also to the learned counsel for the State to ensure compliance. 9. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 07.07.2026 Uploaded On: 07.07.2026 Mukul/-