Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19116 (HP)

NARINDER SINGH v. M. SUDHA DEVI AND ANOTHER

COPC/404/2026 · 2026-08-05

Sushil Kukreja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:HHC:32544 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.404 of 2026 Date of Decision: 05.08.2026 ___________________________________________________ Narinder Singh ....Petitioner Versus M. Sudha Devi and another …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate, vice Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) On 21.07.2026, this Court passed the following order:- “Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 20.07.2026, alongwith copy of office order of even date, wherein it has been stated that the services of the petitioner has been taken over as Clerk w.e.f. 04.07.2007 on notional basis and 21.11.2019 on actual basis, vide office order dated 20.07.2026.” 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:32544 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged 3. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to him under the law. The petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) August 05, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)