Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19113 (AP)

V. Raghunath v. The Union of India

WP/7867/2021 · 2026-02-10

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010140472021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 7867/2021 Between: V. RAGHUNATH, S/O. V. KUMARA SWAMY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, QCC ADVOCATE R/O H.NO.13-9, P ANDT COLONY, DILSUKHNAGAR, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. THE NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY, REP. BY DEPUTY SP/CIO, NIA, HYDERABAD, CAMP VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, P.S. MUNCHINGPUT, VISHAKAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: S GOUTHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.7867 of 2021 Dated 11.02.2026 2. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following: ORDER: There was no representation for the petitioner on 21.01.2026. Even after posting the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’ today, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 11.02.2026 RSI 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.7867 of 2021 Dated 11.02.2026 80 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 7867 of 2021 Date: 11.02.2026 RSI