AWADHESH YADAV ALIAS AWADHESH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6173/2026 · 2026-07-06
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19110 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19110 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:19806] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.6173 of 2026
------ Awadhesh Yadav @ Awadhesh Kumar, Aged 32, S/O- Suresh Yadav @ Suresh Singh Yadav @ Suresh Singh, R/O- Near D.A.V. Public School, P.O. + P.S. Argora, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party.
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate.
Mr. Dilip kr. Saw, Advocate.
Ms. Arti Kumari, Advocate.
For the State
: Mr. B.N. Ojha, Spl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 06-07-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Hindpiri P.S. Case No. 43 of 2026 (N) registered for the offence punishable under Sections 20, 21(a), 22(b), 29 of the NDPS Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in sale and purchase of Ganja and 9.347 of Ganja was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and while from the possession of the co-accused 260 grams of Ganja, 20 pieces of Tazowin Injections, 40 pieces of Nitrosun Tablet and from the another co-accused person 39.834 grams of Ganja and 6.888 grams of Brown sugar, which is also known as heroin, was recovered. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the co-accused persons have been admitted to bail by this court vide order dated 30.06.2026 in B.A. No. 5907 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents as mentioned in para 12. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted the petitioner has been in custody since 12.05.2026 as mentioned in para-11 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted
that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Spl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of Judicial Commissioner-cum- Spl.Judge-NDPS, Ranchi in connection with Hindpiri P.S. Case No. 43 of 2026 (N) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 06/07/2026 Amar/