APHC010136622003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 18452/2003 Between: 1.A.P. S.C. WELFARE ASSOCIATION, AMBEDKAR BHAVAN, TIRUPATHI, REP. BY ITS GENERAL SECRETAY, P. CHENGALRAYULU, S/O.NARSAIH, R/O. TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.S V UNIVERSITY, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2.GOVERNMENT OF A P REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the 1st respondent in not implementing the G.O.Ms. No. 5 dt. 14.8.2003, G.O.Ms. No. 21 dt. 18.3.2003 and G.O.Ms. No. 65 dt. 25.2.1997 and not following the Rule of Reservation as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st respondent herein to strictly follow the Rule of Reservation basing on the above G.O.'s and to grant such other relief IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 23007 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the respondents herein not to give any further promotions in the 1st respondent University, till the disposal of the Writ Petition, IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 209758 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.B SOMASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.. 2.RAMESH BABU TALLURI SC For S.V.UNIVERSITY,TIRUPATI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION No.18452 of 2003 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and as such, the matter has rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANAJAN Date: 22.01.2026 CVD