Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19098 (JHR)

SANGEETA SOREN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY

WPC/2797/2026 · 2026-07-01

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:19608 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 2797 of 2026 ---------- Sangeeta Soren, aged about 35 years, wife of Krishna Marandi, resident of village Kittajhor, P.O. Ladhna, P.S. & District Jamtara. ………. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.Ο. & P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand). 2. The Principal Secretary School Education and Literacy Department Government of Jharkhand having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand). 3. The Principal Secretary Department of Personnel Administrative Reforms and Raj Bhasha having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Ranchi (Jharkhand). District- 4. The Director Secondary Education Government of Jharkhand having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi (Jharkhand). 5. The Chairman Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand) 6. The Secretary Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand) 7. The Examination Controller Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand). ………. Respondents. ---------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Jayant Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Oishi Das, AC to AG M/s. Sanjoy Piprawall, Prince Kumar, Jay Prakash, Advocates ---------- 02/ 01.07.2026 This writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for a direction upon the respondents to accommodate the petitioner and call her in the counseling process to be conducted for the post of Assistant Teacher in the subject of Geography. 2. At the outset learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in this writ application is same and similar to that of W.P.(S). No. 582 of 2023 (Mina Kumari & Ors. Vs. the State of Jharkhand 2026:JHHC:19608 2 & Ors.) and other analogous cases, wherein a One-Man Fact-Finding Commission has been constituted and the petitioner wants to approach the said Commission ventilating her grievances. 3. There is no objection from the other side. 4. Accordingly, the instant application stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed for. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 1st July, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded 07.07.2026