[2026:RJ-JP:305] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15965/2022 Narainlal Palsania S/o Chittar Mal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village Post Maheswas Kalla Tehsil Amer District Jaipur Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Mission Director National Health Mission Swasthya Bhawan Tilak Marg C-Scheme Jaipur Rajasthan 2. Project Director, Rbsk National Health Mission Swasthya Bhawan Tilak Marg C-Scheme Jaipur Rajasthan 3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Dist. Jodhpur Ratanada Jodhpur Rajasthan 4. District Reproductive And Child Health Officer, Dist. Jodhpur Ratanada Jodhpur Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Yaduvanshi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC with Ms. Sweekriti Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 07/01/2026 1. Application No. 01/2025 filed for early listing stands disposed of. 2. Instant writ petition is filed with following prayer:- "So it is therefore humbly prayed that this writ petition of the petitioner may kindly be allowed and office order dated 30.09.2022 may kindly be quashed and petitioner may be reinstated in service with all consequential benefits.” 3. During course of argument, learned counsel appearing for respondents submits that the petitioner may submit his representation, which shall be considered by the respondent(s). [2026:RJ-JP:305] (2 of 2) [CW-15965/2022] 4. Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon judgment dated 10.08.2023 in S.B. CWP No. 170/2019 titled as Mahendra Kumar Jatoliya and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. submits that the petitioner be given a liberty to submit a representation with direction to the respondent(s) to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down by a Co- ordinate Bench in case of Mahendra Kumar Jatoliya and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. (supra). 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Mahendra Kumar Jatoliya and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /20