DHEERAJ SHARMA AND OTHERS v. RAKESH KANWAR AND OTHERS
COPC/688/2026 · 2026-08-21
Sushil Kukreja
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19094 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19094 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 . ( 2026:HHC:35446 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 688 of 2026
Decided on: 21.08.2026 ________________________________________________ Dheeraj Sharma & Ors. ....Petitioners Versus
Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Ms. Sarita Rana, Advocate, vice Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 20.08.2026, wherein, it has been stated that the judgment under reference has been duly complied with and the arrear will be credited in the accounts of the petitioners very shortly.
2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the same is closed. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 . ( 2026:HHC:35446 )
3. However, the petitioners are at liberty to revive the present contempt petition, if occasion arises to do so. The petition, so also pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
21st August, 2026 Judge (raman)