Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19090 (JHR)

ISRAT BIBI ALIAS ISRAT PHATMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6241/2026 · 2026-07-06

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:19827 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6241 of 2026 ------ Israt Bibi @ Israt Phatma, aged about 26 years, wife of Late Gulam Mustafa, Resident of Village-Khala, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurki, District- Garhwa (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Syed Tafazzul Sajid, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 06-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Dhurki P.S. Case No.18 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under section 108 of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner abetted the suicide of her husband namely Gulam Mustafa. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that admittedly, because of quarrel between the petitioner and her husband, her husband consumed a highly poisonous pesticide namely Sulphas but there is no allegation of abetment of suicide of the deceased by the petitioner. It is then submitted that the quarrel between the petitioner and a husband was a normal wear and tear of matrimony and petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para –11 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.05.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no.14 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that she will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Nagar Untari, Garhwa, in connection with Dhurki P.S. Case No.18 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co- operate with the trial of the case and will furnish her mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that she will not change her mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that she will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 06/07/2026 Abhiraj/