Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19087 (PAT)

Pramod Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./39380/2026 · 2026-06-22

Satyavrat Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39380 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-227 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== 1. Pramod Kumar S/o Balkishun Yadav Resident of Village- Chitarkoli, PS- Rajouli, District- Nawada, 2. Ravi Kumar S/o Sanjay Pandit Resident of Village- Chitarkoli, PS- Rajouli, District- Nawada, ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Man Mohan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 22-06-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 71 litres of liquor from bushes near the boundary wall of forest department at village Chitrakoli. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners were not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from their conscious possession and even alleged Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39380 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026 2/3 recovery is from a place, which does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to public at large and he came to be implicated based on secret information which is the easiest way to implicate someone without holding a proper investigation. 5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Nawada Excise P. S. Case No.227 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 7. The application stands allowed. 8. It is made clear that the learned trial Court after accepting the provisional bail bonds of the petitioners shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in the event, if it is found that petitioners have antecedent of even one case, then it would be presumed that petitioners for the purposes of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39380 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026 3/3 obtaining anticipatory bail had concealed their antecedent before this Court, in that event, the present provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but if on verification, it is found that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent, in that event, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T