SHAIK SHALIM v. THE COMMISSIONER CT AND GST, ODISHA, CUTTACK
WP(C)/12718/2026 · 2026-05-18
Harish Tandon Cj, Murahari Sri Raman
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19085 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19085 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.12718 of 2026
Shaik Shalim …. Petitioner Mr. Soumendra Kumar Nayak, Advocate -versus- The Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. Sheshadeba Das, Additional Standing Counsel for Department
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE MR JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Order No.
ORDER 18.05.2026
01.
1.
Learned counsel appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, under challenge is show cause notice dated 4th September, 2024 followed by order dated 19th October, 2024 cancelling his client’s registration under Central Goods and Services Tax Act,
2017. He submits, his client is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid for the return form of his client to be accepted by the department. He relies on order dated 16th November, 2022 of coordinate Bench in W.P.(C) no.30374 of 2022 (M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. The Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack and others). He submits, his client’s claim to relief including prayer for condonation of delay is covered by said order.
2. Mr. Sheshadeba Das, learned Additional Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the opposite parties-Department.
3. We reproduce below paragraph-2 from said order in M/s. Mohanty Enterprises (supra).
"2. In that view of the matter, the delay in Petitioner’s invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules (OGST Rules) is condoned and it is directed that subject to the Petitioner depositing all the taxes, interest, late fee, penalty etc., due and complying with other formalities, the Petitioner’s application for revocation will be considered in accordance with law."
Likewise direction is made in this writ petition. Petitioner gets the relief in the interest of revenue.
4. The writ petition is disposed of.
(Harish Tandon)
Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman) Judge
Sisira