MD TABREJ ALIAS MD TABREJ ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./11498/2025 · 2026-02-24
Sri Ananda Sen
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1908 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1908 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:5411 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 11498 of 2025
----- 1.Md. Tabrej @ Md. Tabrej Ansari, S/o Abdul Aziz, R/o Sahil Chowk, Bari Bazar, P.O. Chaibasa, P.S. Sadar Chaibasa, District West Singhbhum 2.Sheikh Jahiruddin @ Sk. Jahiruddin, S/o Sk. Jalaluddin, R/o Moh. Pulhatu, P.O. Chaibasa, P.S. Sadar Chaibasa, District West Singhbhum
.... Petitioner(s).
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party(s).
------
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anjani Kumar, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Vijoy Kumar Sinha, AddI. P.P.
…...... 03/ 24.02.2026: This bail application has been filed under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as they are in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 316(2), 316(3), 318(3), 318(4), 338, 336(3)/ 340/3(5) of the B.N.S.
2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order.
3. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
4. It is alleged that the agreement was entered into between the accused persons and the villagers for plying the tractor and other vehicles, but the vehicles which were being handed over to them were sold by preparing forged documents.
5. So far as these petitioners are concerned, there is nothing on record to suggest there was any agreement between the petitioners and villagers.
6. The A.P.P. admits there is no agreement in the case-diary. Further he admitted that the vehicle which has been recovered from the house of the petitioner No.1 belongs to him.
7. From the aforesaid fact and submission, I find that there are no other recovery from the house of these petitioners. Chargesheet has already been submitted and cognizance has been taken in this case.
Petitioners are in custody since 01.07.2025.
8. Considering the period of custody and the fact that chargesheet has been submitted and charge has been framed, I am inclined to grant bail to these petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, are
directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa in connection with Majhgaon Police Station Case No.18 of 2025 subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be a close relative of the petitioners, having sufficient landed property in his own name within the State of Jharkhand.
(ANANDA SEN, J.)
24th February, 2026 R.S./ Uploaded on 25/02/2026