1 2026:CGHC:22491-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1338 of 2026 Jaideep Singh S/o Lt. Malkit Singh Aged About 36 Years Resident Of- Shastri Nagar, Near Bhaskar Hospital, Karm Chari Nagar, Rampur, District- Bareily (U.P.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Police Station- Akaltara, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 2 - T.S. Pattavi Nayapara, Santoshi Mandir Chowk, Sirgitti, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Hemlata Yadav W/o Late Rakesh Kumar Yadav Aged About 24 Years R/o- Ram Rani Bada, Jagmal Chowk, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Palash Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Deputy G.A. Hon'ble S hri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri R avindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 13/05/2026 1. Heard Mr. Prakash Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, learned Deputy Govt. Advocate for the VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2026.05.13 20:25:20 +0530 2 respondent No.1/State. 2. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashment of FIR No. 630/2023 dated 16.12.2023 registered at Police Station Akaltara, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 306/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, together with Charge-sheet No. 597/2025 dated 26.12.2025, cognizance order dated 02.01.2026 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Akaltara, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), and the order of committal dated 22.04.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Janjgir in Sessions Trial No. 49/2026 arising out of Crime No. 630/2023 (wrongly mentioned as 630/2025), insofar as they relate to the present applicant. 3. The petitioner has filed the present Criminal Miscellaneous Petition with the following relief: “A. the impugned F.I.R. No. 630/2023 dated 16.12.2023 lodged at Police Station Akaltara, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) under section 306/34, of Indian Penal Code, 1860 against the present applicant; B. The Charge-sheet No. 597/2025 dated 26.12.2025 filed before JMFC - Akaltara (District - Janjgir - Champa C.G) filed in F.I.R. No. 630/2023 dated 16.12.2023 lodged at Police Station Akaltara, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) under section 306/34, of Indian Penal Code,1860 against the present applicant; 3 C. the cognizance order dated 02.01.2026 passed by Learned Judicial Magistrate First Class Akaltara, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G) in Crime No. 630/2023 (Wrongly mentioned as 630/2025), wherein cognisance has been taken against the present applicant under section 306/34, of Indian Penal Code,1860; and D. order dated 22.04.2026, passed by Ld. Sessions Judge - Janjgir; District - Janjgir- Champa, in Sessions trial No. 49 of 2026, wherein the criminal proceedings have been committed before the Ld. trial Court registered under section 306/34, of Indian Penal Code,1860; E. and also praying for dismissal of all the proceedings pending before Ld. Sessions Judge - Janjgir; District - Janjgir-Champa, in Sessions trial No. 49 of 2026 under section 306/34, of Indian Penal Code,1860 emanating thereto with respect to the present applicant in the ends of justice.” 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has annexed the certified copy of the charge-sheet along with the documents annexed thereto. He further submits that though the index of the charge-sheet reflects that a copy of the suicide note was enclosed with the charge- sheet, however, while obtaining the certified copy of the charge-sheet along with the accompanying documents, the copy of the suicide note was not supplied to him. 5. On a query being made by this Court as to whether any separate application was moved before the concerned Court for supply of the said document, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no such 4 application has been filed. 6. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh after obtaining the said document and annexing the same. 7. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 8. Certified copies filed along with the petition be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining attested true copies thereof on record. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice ved