Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19078 (JHR)

URMILA MUNDA v. THE JHARKHAND STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION THROUGH ITS SECRETARY

WPC/3931/2026 · 2026-07-01

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:19609 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 3931 of 2026 ---------- 1. Urmila Munda, aged about 36 years, D/o Anil Munda, R/o Village Tentuldanga, P.O. Dova, P.S. Dhalbhumgarh & District-East Singhbhum. 2. Kanda Munda, aged about 47 years, S/o Jargum Munda, R/o Village Pora, P.O. Butgora, P.S. Kowali & District- East Singhbhum. 3. Kisun Besra, aged about 43 years, S/o Sitaram Besra, R/o Village Chepo, P.O. Baddiha, P.S. Giridih & District- Giridih. 4. Mirulal Soren, aged about 43 years, S/o Lata Hopna Soren, P.O., P.S. Bengabad & District- Giridih. 5. Manoj Kumar, aged about 39 years, S/o Munna Lal Yadav, R/o Village Bhuraki, P.O. Gyanpur, P.S. Gyanpur District-Sant Ravidas Nagar & State -Uttar Pradesh Pin-221304. 6. Naresh Kumar Yadav, aged about 40 years, S/o Late Hemraj Yadav, R/o Village Maheshmrva, Dhanwar, P.O. Doranda, P.S. Dhanwar & District- Giridih. 7. Awdesh Kumar, aged about 37 years, S/o Nandlal Kapri, R/o Village Kaswa, P.O. B. Mahadevgarh, P.S. Hansdiha & District- Dumka. ………. Petitioners Versus 1. The Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission through its Secretary, having its office at Kali Nagar, Chai Bagan, P.О., P.S. Namkum & District - Ranchi. 2. The Chairman, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, having its office at Kali Nagar, Chai Bagan, P.O., P.S. Namkum & District Ranchi. 3. The Examination Controller, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, having its office at Kali Nagar, Chai Bagan, P.O., P.S. Namkum & District - Ranchi. ………. Respondents. ---------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Chanchal Jain, Advocate For the Respondents : M/s. Sanjoy Piprawall, Prince Kumar, Jay Prakash, Advocates ---------- 02/ 01.07.2026 This writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for following reliefs: i. For issuance of appropriate writ(s), order(s) or direction(s) in the nature of mandamus commanding upon the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioners for appointment on the post of Graduate Trained Teacher in their respective subjects in terms of the order dated 02.08.2022 (Annexure 1) passed in Civil Appeal No. 4038/2022 & 2026:JHHC:19609 2 analogous cases read with the order dated 15.12.2022 passed in Contempt Petition (C) No. 612/2022 (Annexure 3) & analogous cases wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has specifically directed the State Government to "revise the merit list based on the already published cut off obtained by the last selected candidate in each TGT subject against the respective categories with respect to entire State". ii. For issuance of appropriate writ(s), order(s) or direction(s) commanding upon the respondents to appoint the petitioners on the post of Graduate Trained Teacher in their respective subjects in pursuance of Advt. No. 21/2016. 2. At the outset learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in this writ application is same and similar to that of W.P.(S). No. 582 of 2023 (Mina Kumari & Ors. Vs. the State of Jharkhand & Ors.) and other analogous cases, wherein a One-Man Fact-Finding Commission has been constituted and the petitioners want to approach the said Commission ventilating her grievances. 3. There is no objection from the other side. 4. Accordingly, the instant application stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed for. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 1st July, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded 07.07.2026