Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19073 (RAJ)

SHYOJI LAL MEENA SON OF GOKULRAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/359/2025 · 2026-02-02

Mahendar Kumar Goyal, Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4745-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 359/2025 Shyoji Lal Meena Son Of Gokulram, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Village Paprala, Police Station Hindoli, District Bundi, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan. 3. The Superintendent Of Police, Bundi. 4. The Sho, Police Station Hindoli, District Bundi. 5. Ravi Kumar Son Of Hemraj Meena, Resident Of Paprala, Police Station Hindoli, District Bundi. 6. Kanta Wife Of Hemraj 7. Pappulal Son Of Hemraj 8. Hemraj Son Of Gopal 9. Dharamraj Son Of Chhotu 10. Deepak Son Of Dharamraj Meena All Residents Of Paprala, Police Station Hindoli, District Bundi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitin Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Agarwal, AAAG Mr. Vinod Sharma Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, DGC Ms. Neha Goyal Mr. Krishan Kumar Sharma Mr. Mukesh Yadav, CI, PS Hindoli, District-Bundi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order [2026:RJ-JP:4745-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-359/2025] 02/02/2026 Pursuant to order of this Court dated 07.01.2026, “Ms. P” is appears before us on her own. Indisputably, she is major. On interaction, she stated that she is major and has married Shri Ravi Kumar-respondent No. 5. She desires to go back to him. Since, “Ms. P” is major, she is at liberty to go wherever she desires. The habeas corpus petition is disposed of accordingly. (SAMEER JAIN),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Tahir/5