BHUPENDRA RAJAK v. CHHATTISGARH STATE MARKETING CORPORATION LIMITED
WPS/4145/2026 · 2026-05-13
Shri Bibhu Datta Guru
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19071 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19071 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:22813
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4145 of 2026 Bhupendra Rajak S/o Ramnarayan Aged About 29 Years R/o Ward No. 07, Krishna Chowk, Kharora, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Marketing Corporation Limited Throughits Managing Director, Head Office, At 1st Floor, Room Number 22, Excise Office Collectorate Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The General Manager, Chhattisgarh State Marketing Corporation Limited, Head Office, At 1st Floor, Room Number 22, Excise Office Collectorate Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Nikhil Parakh, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU)
Order on Board 14/05/2026
1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide his pending SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2026.05.15 10:52:49 +0530
2 representation dated 24/12/2025 and further seeks a direction towards the respondents to remove his name from the blacklist.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has been reflected in the blacklist employee portal maintained by Chhattisgarh State Marketing Corporation Limited (CSMCL) without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the same is contrary to the principles of natural justice. He further submits that vide communication dated 01/04/2025 (Annexure P-3), the General Manager, CSMCL, District Raipur, has already requested the Managing Director, CSMCL to remove/delete the name of the petitioner from the blacklist employee portal on the ground that the name of the petitioner was wrongly entered therein.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that in view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, he has no objection in the matter and the name of the petitioner shall be deleted from the blacklist employee portal within a period of 10 days.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents appended with the writ petition.
5. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the respondents, the respondents are directed to delete/remove the name of the petitioner from the blacklist employee portal maintained by the corporation within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
3
6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid direction.
Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU)
JUDGE $. Bhilwar