IN TH 122 Surender Kuma State of Haryan CORAM: HON Present: - Mr. Mr. JAGMOHAN B 1. The the Constitution with respect to w 2. Lear Mukesh Kumar petitioner for the pending before C 27.05.2026. 3. Lear dispute the afores 4. Dism 5. The by law. 13.05.2026 Vimal Wh Wh N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGAR CW Dat Kumar Contractor Versus aryana & others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGM Mr. Sachin Mankash, Advocate, for Mr. Deepak Vashisth, DAG, Haryan AN BANSAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner through instant petit tution of India is seeking direction to r ct to work executed by him. Learned State counsel at the outs umar, Deputy Superintendent, PH for the same grievance has filed Civi efore Civil Judge (Junior Division), B Learned counsel for the petitione aforesaid fact. Dismissed without commenting on m The petitioner is at liberty to avail a Whether speaking/reasoned Ye Whether reportable Ye NJAB AND HARYANA GARH CWP-14383-2026 Date of Decision: 13.05.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents AGMOHAN BANSAL te, for the petitioner. aryana. t petition under Articles 226/227 of on to respondents to release payment e outset on instructions from Mr. t, PHED, Haryana submits that Civil Suit No.1618/2024 which is ion), Bhiwani and is now fixed for titioner expressed his inability to g on merits. avail alternate remedy as permissible (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No of ment Mr. that ch is d for ty to sible VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.13 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.