Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19061 (JHR)

CHANARDHAN YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3589/2026 · 2026-07-06

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2026:JHHC:19774] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3589 of 2026 1. Chanardhan Yadav, aged about 37 years, S/o Late Baul Yadav, 2. Vijay Yadav, aged about 46 years, S/o Jitu Yadav, 3.Santosh Yadav, aged 30 years, S/o Vinod Yadav, 4. Sakendra Yadav, aged about 37 years, S/o Jitu Yadav, All are residents of village-Gudri, PO & PS- Chhatarpur, District- Palamau, Jharkhand. ..... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 06.07.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Chhattarpur P.S. Case No. 107 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 117(2) and 109 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Palamau. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that both the parties are agnates and for the land dispute, the altercation took place and there are case and counter case between the parties. He next submits that both the sides have received the injuries and the same were found to be simple in nature. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioners. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of making assault. 5. Considering that there are case and counter case between [ 2026:JHHC:19774] -2- the parties and the altercation took place due to land dispute and both the parties are agnates and further the injuries were found to be simple in nature and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, above named. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Palamau, in connection with Chhattarpur P.S. Case No. 107 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-06.07.2026 Amitesh/-