AMBALIKA PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
WPC/581/2025 · 2026-07-03
Deepak Roshan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19060 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19060 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:19630
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No. 581 of 2025
……
1. Ambalika Prasad, aged about 62 years, D/o Janki Jivan Prasad, R/o Sudna, Daltonganj, P.O. & P.S. Sudna, District Palamu, Jharkhand;
2. Sarita Kumari, aged about 66 years, W/o Avinash Kumar Sriwastava, R/o Beside Mahadev Tempal, Muhalla Amber Choraha, P.O. & P.S. Nalanda, District Nalanda, Bihar;
3. Ashwini Kumar Vaidya, aged about 64 years, S/o Vidyadhar Vaidya, R/o Village Sarjamatu Pagar, P.O. & P.S. Panki, District Palamu, Jharkhand;
4. Surendra Kumar Pandey, aged about 62 years, S/o Ram Krishna Pandey, R/o Village Karakat, Chainpur, P.O. Shahpur, P.S. Chainpur, District Palamu, Jharkhand;
5. Shobha Rani, aged about 64 years, D/o Ram Sumer Dubey, R/o Jail Hata, Sarvoday Nagar, Ward No. 19, Daltonganj, P.O. & P.S. Daltonganj, District Palamu, Jharkhand 822101;
6. Dilip Kumar, aged about 64 years, S/o Sheonandan Prasad, R/o Beside Sohsa Diary, Sarvodya Nagar, Jailhata, P.O. & P.S. Daltonganj, District Palamu, Jharkhand;
7. Raj Kumar Sinha, aged about 65 years, S/o Devnandan Prasad, R/o Housing Colony, Near Tranfarmer Baralota, P.O. & P.S. Daltonganj, District Palamu, Jharkhand.
…. Petitioner(s) -VERSUS-
1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Higher, Technical Education & Skill Development, Government of Jharkhand, Office at 3rd Floor, Yojana Bhawan, Nepal House, P.O and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand 834002.
2. The Director, Higher Education, Department of Higher, Technical Education & Skill Development, Government of Jharkhand, Office at 3rd Floor, Yojana Bhawan, Nepal House, P.O and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand 834002.
3. Nilamber-Pitamber University, through the Registrar, Office at Medininagar, P.O. & P.S Medininagar, District Palamu, Jharkhand.
4. The Vice Chancellor, Nilamber-Pitamber University, Office at Medininagar, P.O. & P.S Medininagar, District Palamu, Jharkhand.
2026:JHHC:19630
5. The Registrar, Nilamber-Pitamber University, Office at Medininagar, P.O. & P.S Medininagar, District Palamu, Jharkhand.
…..Respondent (s)
……
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Baibhaw Gahlaut, Adv
For the Respondent (s) : Mr. Rahul Saboo, G.P.-II
Mr. Ashok Kr. Singh, Adv
……
04/03.07.2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioners for the following reliefs:- (A) For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, direction upon the Respondents to pay the arrears of salary of the Petitioners for the period of 01.01.1996 to 31.03.2000 under the 5th Pay Fixation that has not been paid to the Petitioners even after the regularization of the services of the Petitioners by Ranchi University pursuant to the judgment dated 12.10.2004 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 6098 of 1997.
3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the instant writ application may be
disposed of by directing the concerned respondent to look into the matter and pass an appropriate order.
4.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since no counter-affidavit has been filed as such the petitioners may be directed to file fresh representation before the respondents for redressal of their respective grievance.
5. Having regard to the fair submission made by
learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the respondent-Registrar, Nilamber-Pitamber University to treat this writ application as representation and take a decision in the matter in accordance with law and
2026:JHHC:19630
applicable rules and regulations within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this
order and if the case of the petitioners is found to be suitable; then it will recommend the case before respondent-State who shall take a necessary decision in the matter within a further period of 4 weeks.
6. As a result, the instant writ application stands
disposed of in the manner indicated herein above. Pending I.As., if any, also stands disposed of.
(Deepak Roshan, J) 03.07.2026 Amardeep/
Uploaded on 07.07.2026