APHC010136822026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 8096/2026 Between: 1. C.C. NARAYANARAJU,, S/O. LATE C.PAPARAJU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT RAMARAJU KANDRIGA VILLAGE, VADAMALAPETA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, A.P - 517551 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI.- 522238 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, HOLDING OFFICE AT TIRUPATI, AP.517503. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, HOLDING OFFICE AT TIRUPATI, AP. 517503. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI, HOLDING OFFICE AT TIRUPATI, AP.517503. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, VADAMALAPETA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, AP.517551 6. THE GRAMA PANCHYATI, OBULA RAJU KANDRIGA, REP BY SECRETARY. OBULA RAJUKANDRIGA VILLAGE, VADAMALAPETA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, AP.51758 7. D LEELAVATHI, W/O. LATE D. CHENGAL RAJU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RESIDING AT VASANTHAPURAM VILLAGE, 2 BKM,J W.P.No.8096 of 2026 NARAYANAPURAM POST, VIA S.B.R. PURAM, VADAMALAPETA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. - 517589 8. V CHANDANA, D/O. LATE SUBBARAMARAJU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, RESIDING AT VASANTHAPURAM VILLAGE, NARAYANAPURAM POST, VIA S.B.R. PURAM, VADAMALAPETA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. - 517589 9. K SIVA RAJU, S/O. LATE K. SUBBARAJU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RESIDING AT VASANTHAPURAM VILLAGE, NARAYANAPURAM POST, VIA S.B.R. PURAM, VADAMALAPETA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. - 517589 10. V UMA, W/O. V. RAMA CHANDRA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT VASANTHAPURAM VILLAGE, NARAYANAPURAM POST, VIA S.B.R. PURAM, VADAMALAPETA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. - 517589 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ACHUTARAMAIAH SRAVANAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 BKM,J W.P.No.8096 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 5. 2. The issuance of notices to the respondent Nos.7 to 10 is dispensed with as no prejudice would cause to them even if it is disposed of in their absence. 3. This writ petition is filed questioning the non-disposal of the revision petition filed before the 3rd respondent. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that taking undue advantage of pendency of the revision petition before the 3rd respondent, the unofficial respondents are trying to construct or raise sheds in the subject land covered under the said revision petition. 5. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 5 submits that the 3rd respondent will pass appropriate orders, following the due procedure in the revision petition filed by the petitioner dated 25.09.2025. 6. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the 3rd respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the revision petition filed by the petitioner dated 25.09.2025 strictly in accordance with law, by hearing all the parties concerned, including the petitioner and the respondent Nos.7 to 10 and others concerned, giving due opportunity, upon verification of the records and the subject land covered under the above said revision, appropriate orders shall 4 BKM,J W.P.No.8096 of 2026 be passed on its own merits as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of this order. It is open for the petitioner to move the interim application if any before the revisional authority and if so filed, the same shall be considered on its own merits by giving due opportunity to both the parties concerned. 7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 30.03.2026 PGT