Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19058 (KAR)

PRASAD REDDY v. SRI H NARAYAN

CRP/258/2025 · 2026-06-03

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26056 CRP No. 258 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 258 OF 2025 (IO) BETWEEN: SRI.PRASAD REDDY S/O G.SRINIVAS REDDY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/A D.NO.59, 5TH CROSS 3RD BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560 034 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SIRI RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI H.NARAYAN S/O LATE HUCHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS 2. SRI. K.G. SANGEEVAIAH, S/O LATE GUDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 3. SRI.DEVAPRASAD S/O MADDURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 4. SRI.S.VENKATESH S/O SANJEEVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 5. SRI.M.MUNIRAJU S/O G.MADDURAIAH AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26056 CRP No. 258 of 2025 ALL ARE RESIDING AT CHOODAYYANAPURA VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BENGLAURU-560 060 6. SRI. MATHEW JACOB S/O LATE JACOB VARGHEESH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 7. SMT. THERESSA MATTHEW D/O LATE JACOB VARGHEESH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.23, REST HOUSE APARTMENTS, NO.14, REST HOUSE ROAD, BANGALORE- 560 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.M.Y.LOKESH, ADVOCATE AND SMT.JASWITA PRIMITHA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2 NOTICE TO R6 & R7 ARE D/W V/O/DATED: 08/04/2025) THIS CRP FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 15.03.2025 PASSED ON IA NO. I IN OS NO.869/2005 ON THE FILE OF C/C. PRL. CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE, REJECTING THE IA NO.I FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(a) AND (d) OF CPC., FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26056 CRP No. 258 of 2025 ORAL ORDER A memo is filed stating that the matter is amicably settled outside the Court and the petitioner wants to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE PKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1