Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19057 (AP)

Seelam Vijaya Bhaskara Reddy v. The Ministry Of Corporate Affairs

WP/5873/2019 · 2026-01-06

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010134452019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 5873/2019 Between: 1. SEELAM VIJAYA BHASKARA REDDY,, S/O. LATE SEELAM NARASIMHA REDDY, R/O. HOUSE NO. 432, 15TH WARD, NEAR CHANDRA MOULESHWARA TEMPLE, HOSPET, BELLARY, KARNATAKA - 583201 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, A WING, SHASTRI BHAWAN, RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD, NEW DELHI - 110 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, HYDERABAD (FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH), 29-7-33, GOLI COMPLEX, OPP. HASINI HOSPITAL, VISHUNUVARDHANA RAO ST., SURYARAOPETA, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH - 520002 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto pass an order or direction or any other proceedings one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents in deactivating the DIN 02893212 of the Petitioner and restricting the Petitioner from filing statutory returns, i.e., the annual returns and financial statements of the Companies in which she is a Director as arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction, contrary of the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 11 of the Companies (Appointment of Directors) Rules, 2014, violative of the 2 principles of natural justice besides violating the petitioners' rights guaranteed under Article 14 and Article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the deactivation and restore the DIN 02893212 of the Petitioner so as to enable the petitioner to submit the annual returns and financial statements for the Companies in which she is appointed as Director, pending disposal of main writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SOMU KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. B KRISHNA MOHAN (ASST SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA) 2. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that by virtue of the interim order, dated 26.04.2019, the DIN number of the petitioner was restored. Hence, no further orders are required in the writ petition. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 07.01.2026 KAS 4 125 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 5873/2019 Dated: 07.01.2026 KAS